Music licensing investigation hits a sour note with retailers

continued from page 1

That’s because BMI, one of three major U.S. companies that license public performance of music, is in the midst of what it calls an intensive campaign to inform as many as one million retailers and other businesses that they may be violating copyright laws by playing music for their customers.

BMI describes its campaign as an educational process. But several retailers who have been contacted by BMI told the Michigan Retailer that the company’s approach can be misleading and seems calculated to scare retailers into paying for a license.

“It looks like their tactic is to catch you off guard,” said Faye Hirt, owner of Faye’s at Mira, a women’s clothing store in Holland that was called by BMI. According to Hirt, the BMI representative asked the employee who answered the phone if the store played music. Shortly afterward, Hirt received a licensing contract - with her business name and address filled in - indicating that she owed BMI more than $300 per year for permission to play music.

After calling MRA to find out whether music licensing laws applied to her business, Hirt informed BMI that she was exempt because her store played only radio music and fell within guidelines on the maximum number of speakers allowed. She later got into what she described as a testy conversation with a follow-up caller from BMI.

“They didn’t seem to be looking out for our best interests,” she said.

Another MRA member, the owner of a furniture store in southwest Michigan who preferred not to be identified, said the employee who answered her store’s call from BMI thought it was a radio station doing a survey.

She also received a filled-out contract for a license that would have cost her business $1,957.50 per year. However, she said a license wasn’t necessary because she plays music only in the office, not on the sales floor.

Stepped-up enforcement
Bill Grothe, senior attorney and senior director of BMI’s General Licensing division, confirmed that BMI staff have been calling retailers since last October to ask if they are using music in their stores. If the answer is yes, he said, the company sends out information about BMI and music licensing, along with a contract for a BMI license.

The other two music licensing companies, ASCAP and SESAC, may also contact retailers to monitor compliance with licensing requirements.

ASCAP relies on its area licensing managers, who visit businesses to observe music use. It also receives tips from consumers and business competitors, according to Bonnie King, ASCAP vice president, general licensing.

New technologies and changing music usage have prompted licensing companies to step up enforcement in less traditional music-using venues, such as retail stores.

Because musical works are copyrighted, permission is required for public performance, which includes broadcast of radio, television or recorded music in a public place, as well as live performances.

Music licenses give businesses a convenient way to obtain permission for public performance without contracting with each copyright holder individually. They enable songwriters, composers and music publishers (not performers) to protect their copyrights and collect royalties for use of their works.

Each of the licensing companies contracts with different songwriters and publishers, so a license with all three allows businesses to play songs by almost any artist in a wide range of styles and time periods.

Licensing with all three costs a minimum of $485 per year for retail establishments and can range into the thousands of dollars, depending on the size of store and type of music used (audio only, audiovisual or live).

Exemptions
Recent changes in copyright law have made it easier for stores and restaurants to publicly perform music (see sidebar at right).

The federal Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 expanded and clarified previous exemptions for businesses playing music from a radio or television broadcast. At the urging of MRA and other retail groups, the legislation added exemptions for retailers playing music for demonstration purposes.

The Michigan Legislature passed a code of conduct for music licensing companies in 2000 that requires them to provide potential licensees with a schedule of rates, a list of the artists and works they cover (if requested) and a notice that some businesses may be exempt.

Grothe said BMI is attempting to inform retailers of their legal obligations, not force them to sign a contract. He said his staff members are instructed to discuss alternatives that are covered by exemptions and don’t require payment.

“Most establishments just don’t know that they need permission to publicly perform copyrighted works,” he said. “Ours is not to try to trick someone into signing a license they don’t need. If we’re forthright about our efforts, a large percentage of business owners choose to exercise their rights within the law.”

Grothe said retailers who use music in their stores should consult with an attorney to determine their potential liability. He also advised retailers who are contacted by BMI not to be intimidated into signing a contract without determining an appropriate music policy for their store.

“They should demand of BMI a discussion of all the options,” he said.

Penalties
For retailers who don’t qualify for an exemption, ignoring the copyright issue can be costly. Licensing companies can sue violators for copyright infringement, to the tune of $750 to $30,000 per song. For willful violations, the maximum fine rises to $150,000.

Larry Leigh, owner of Leigh’s and Mettie’s women’s clothing stores in Grand Rapids, found out the hard way about penalties for unlicensed music use. Several years ago, he received a letter from ASCAP stating that he was violating copyright regulations by playing tapes and CDs in his stores.

Leigh ignored the warning because the business that installed his store stereo system assured him he didn’t need to worry. Two years later, however, he was sued by ASCAP for $400,000. When his attorney informed him that his chances of winning the suit were not good, he settled out of court for a $5,000 fine.

He now uses a music service that costs about $200 per year for each store - less than the cost of licensing, and definitely cheaper than lawsuits and legal fees.

Despite his troubles with ASCAP, Leigh continues to believe in the benefits of music.

“I definitely think music is important in the store,” he said. “It’s an atmosphere creator. Walking into a store that’s dead is intimidating to customers.”

The right music can help convey a store’s desired image and encourage shoppers to browse and buy. Retailers must weigh the benefits of using music against the costs and potential legal consequences. Those who fail to harmonize with copyright regulations could find themselves singing the blues.

This article was written by Michigan Retailer staff writer Rachel Whitaker.

Return to March Michigan Retailer Page one

Music regulations

In general, businesses must obtain permission to play copyrighted music in a public area. This includes live, recorded and broadcast music.

There are some exceptions, however. The following regulations apply to retail stores only. Check with an attorney for a complete assessment of your situation.

Radio and TV
Many retailers do not need a license to play music solely from radio and TV broadcasts. The following are exempt:
• Stores with less than 2,000 square feet of total space;
• Stores of any size that use no more than six radio loudspeakers, with no more than four in any one room;
• Stores of any size that play television broadcasts on up to four TVs, with no more than one per room, and with a maximum screen size of 55 inches each.

Recorded music
Playing recorded music requires a license. The only exceptions are for demonstration purposes (see below).

On-hold music
All on-hold music (even a radio station) must be licensed. If you use an on-hold service, make sure that service is licensed.

Background music services
Make sure the service is licensed. If not, your business will need a license.

Live music
Live performances must be licensed unless the performance is a charitable event. All proceeds must go to charity and the organizers and performers must not receive any pay.

Music demonstration
The following uses are exempt from licensing:
• Playing recorded music in order to sell copies of the recording.
• Demonstrating audiovisual devices (stereos, TVs, etc.) or musical instruments for sale.
However, the music can be played only in the area of the store where these items are for sale.

Admission fees
Charging admission to your place of business or an event nullifies any of these exemptions.
There are two other ways to play music publicly without a license:
• Contract with the copyright holders (such as a local artist) individually.
• Play only public-domain (non-copyrighted) music.