Wake up! Time to get ready for "2005 Sunrise"

This is a tale of two retailers come January 15, 2005.

Retailer #1 is busy selling a hot new product from an overseas trading partner. Demand is high, sales are brisk and the retailer can’t keep enough of it on the shelves.

For retailer #2 it’s another story. This retailer did not address the systems issues to become “2005 Sunrise” compliant and now cannot handle the 13-digit EAN-13 bar code that appears on this overseas product. While the retailer wrangles over unnecessary and time-consuming relabeling issues with the manufacturer, sales are being lost to competitors.

This scenario is not business make-believe. If your company has not addressed the systems impact of the January 1, 2005, Sunrise initiative, this could become a very real and costly issue.

Since the introduction of the 12-digit Universal Product Code (UPC) more than 30 years ago, the use of the EAN.UCC System has emerged as the standard of choice to facilitate efficient global commerce. While U.S. and Canadian companies have used the 12-digit UPC to identify products, the rest of the world uses eight-digit and 13-digit EAN symbols.

To sell products in the U.S. and Canada, overseas manufacturers have had to relabel the products with a 12-digit UPC, which has created additional expense and time-to-market issues. On January 1, 2005, this requirement will end, and overseas manufacturers and suppliers will be free to use EAN bar codes on all products.

To avoid problems, all U.S. and Canadian companies should be capable of scanning EAN-8 and EAN-13 symbols in addition to the 12-digit UPC symbols, at point of sale, by the first of the year.

The decision to switch in 2005 occurred back in 1997, and the UCC publicized “2005 Sunrise.” But many retailers, understandably, put off making the changes until the need was more pressing. That time is now.

Many retailers will discover they are already capable of reading EAN codes. For others, the change means a software upgrade of their point-of-sale systems. It may be as simple as downloading a software upgrade, but since there are so many kinds of retail operations, it’s impossible to say how much work will be involved or what it will cost retailers to make the switch.

If a retailer’s POS system feeds a purchase-order management system or any kind of distribution system, there are more places within the software where product identification codes may reside, which means the retailer may have more work.

Although there’s no legal mandate to upgrade, those who wait face the risk of being at a competitive disadvantage. Some of the costs will come in terms of customer service—misreads at the register, longer lines while problems are sorted out and frustrated staff and customers.

Retailers who choose to deal with the issue now will see a seamless transition; those who wait will find that it costs more in the long run and will be more frustrating for all involved.

Businesses that are or will soon be making these upgrades are advised to go a step further and upgrade to process 14 digits, according to Al Garton at UCC. They will then be prepared to handle any of the product ID number structures that are part of the global system today, as well as emerging technologies.

The UCC refers to this ability to process 14 digits as “GTIN compliant.” The Global Trade Item Number (GTIN) is simply an umbrella term for the four EAN.UCC data structures used to uniquely identify products at all levels of packaging.

Businesses with systems that already scan 13 digits should be aware they may have to make a business decision about when to upgrade to 14 digits.

See “Ask Michigan Retailers” for specific steps you can take to ensure your business is “2005 Sunrise” compliant.

This article was written by Amy Buttery, Michigan Retailer staff writer.

Return to October Michigan Retailer Page one MRA home